One of my biggest complaints about global warming scientists is that they seem to have a conclusion and work backwards. They have a vested interest in making sure their science goes in one direction. That is not science that is dogma. I am perfectly willing to entertain the idea that the war mists may be right, but much of the "science" the warmists put out is full of holes. This paper from a Canadian Scientist pokes big holes in the warming models.
John O'Sullivan: Evidence from Top Climatologist Backs Greenhouse Effect Critics
Thursday, July 28th 2011,
New science papers discrediting greenhouse gas effect fit with findings of top climatologist. Emerging group of skeptics re-ignite debate.
The fledgling new organization, Principia Scientific International (PSI) this week publishes the second of what may be a devastating series of new papers dissecting the traditional greenhouse gas effect and exposing the misuse of equations by climatologists. The new findings fit neatly with those of leading skeptic climatologist, Richard Lindzen, of MIT.
Canadian physicist, Joe Postma presents compelling evidence that equations used by government climate researchers are not valid because they incorrectly treat Earth as is if were a star constantly emitting and receiving its own energy.