Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Goldstein on the climate gate whitewashes

The climategate whitewashes really do nothing but show the debate over climate change is alive and well and in no danger of going away.

Most people understand what an independent public inquiry is.

Except climate scientists and politicians.


In a public inquiry, a third party with no interest in the outcome — typically a judge — is appointed by government with a mandate to investigate an issue of public concern.

The inquiry has its own legal counsel, investigators and budget.

It has the power to compel witnesses to testify publicly, to cross-examine them, to demand documents and call in outside experts.

By that standard, the three official “inquiries” into “Climategate” — the last of which recently “exonerated” scientists at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia (UEA) — again were farces.

Two were cases of the UEA appointing sympathetic academics to investigate itself.

The third was a one-day hearing before a British parliamentary committee in a country that has been at the forefront of global warming hysteria.

No comments:

I Support Lord Black