Thursday, March 25, 2010

grits, the party of Big Abortion

A good piece by Kelly McParland. iffy seems to want to increasingly hang out with the ndp lefty wing of his party. 16 of his 77 MPs did not vote with him on "his" ill conceived motion. maybe the dipper wing have other ideas.
After all a recent poll done for the Manning center showed 60% of respondents think abortion is morally wrong. I suspect there are many who vote grit who are not happy with this motion. Was this bob rae's attempt to embarrass iffy? Is the dipper wing of the grit party trying to oust iffy? Iffy seems hell bent on helping.

And I really don't get the apparent determination of the Liberals to identify themselves as the party of Big Abortion. They've been on this kick for weeks now, culminating in Tuesday's revolt by Liberal MPs against the party leadership. When Michael Ignatieff first suggested the Tories were slagging off women by not energetically encouraging abortion in developing countries, I figured it was just another misstep by a surprisingly accident-prone leader. I thought he'd quickly be apprised of his mistake, and shut up about it. But no. He kept it up, apparently convinced there are votes to be had by raising the one issue guaranteed to make a large segment of the population decidedly uncomfortable.

Even Don Martin is amazed by iffy's ineptitude.

Whatever procedural mixups took place, the damage caused by Liberals rising in person or by proxy to defeat their leader on a rare, firm party position is hard to understate.

Mr. Ignatieff's leadership has been tainted, the Liberal pro-choice policy has been trampled from within and a black-and-white difference with the Conservatives has turned into a foggy shade of grey. Pro-life forces have fired a kill shot at their own leader. How ironic.

More than anything this mess is a stinging indictment of Michael Ignatieff's connection with his own MPs, some who are demoralized at being excluded from this weekend's party think tank, called to ponder a preview of Canada in 2017.

A leader who can't enforce a vote in a minority Parliament with the backing of both opposition partners cannot be taken seriously as someone who will deliver a Liberal vision seven years down the road when, at the rate his performance is deteriorating, he'll be a former Liberal leader...

Instead of fixating on Canada's 150th birthday at their Deep Thinkers conference this weekend, Liberals might want to put a higher priority on surviving the next year or two.

If this sort of sloppy behaviour continues, they'll be dreaming up a 2017 vision for an even smaller Liberal opposition that will be staring across the aisle at a Conservative government dynasty.

No comments:

I Support Lord Black