REx Murphy has a great piece in the Globe and Mail. He writes about one of the chief chicken littles and his call for an inquisition. James Hansen is not a scientist he is a priest of the goreacle religion. He doesn't want to debate, he wants to jail those
that disagree with him, just like Suzuki. It just reveals the weakness of the chicken littles arguments.
He called for a tribunal, or as I prefer to call it, an Inquisition, to put on trial for crimes against nature and humanity, the CEOs of the big oil companies who, according to Dr. Hansen's frantic view of things, feed the public “misinformation” about the climate crisis. Again the implicit model is to Nuremberg, as the man attempts to put concern for a future – let us call it a probability – on a moral and factual par with the unquestioned, historical, shattering enormity of the Nazi Holocaust.
Is this a scientist speaking? If so, it is more than curious that in the 21st century it is the scientist calling for the secular equivalent of an Inquisition. More to the point, are these the words of a man really certain of his truth, or one who – with the anxiety of the fanatic – is trying to shield it from all rigour of skepticism and inquiry? In either case, I do not question at all the assertion that it is the voice of a man who is neither a friend to reason or science. This is the voice of the scientist-activist consumed with his own virtue and fearful of all dispute.
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)










0 comments:
Post a Comment